1st Loop namespace and functions created

If no design mission can be found yet, a 1st loop version of mission analysis is run. Only the following values are written in that mode:

• range (which is equal to the required range)
• loaded_mission_energy/mission_energy
• in_flight_energy/trip_energy
• taxi_energy/taxi_out_energy
• taxi_energy/taxi_in_energy

Please check if we can get into the next loops with this solution

added workflowUNICADOworkflow modulemission_analysis typebug labels

requested review from @kristina.mazur

assigned to @gPauls-TUHH

enabled an automatic merge when all merge checks for 5ff4fcdb pass

assigned to @kbistreck

Looks like a good way forward! The workflow ran in the first iteration and apparently calculated a "simple" mission. In the second loop however it throwed an error: 2024-12-04 - 16:51:06,101: TOOL_ERROR - 04.12.2024 16:51:06 - ERROR: element trip_energy in node C:/Programs/UNICADOworkflow/workingDirectoryRCE/UNICADOworkflow_2024-12-04_16-46-48_28/CSMR-2020/CSMR-2020.xml/aircraft_exchange_file/analysis/mission/design_mission not found (mission_analysis@UNICADOworkflow_2024-12-04_16:46:38_06)

So acc to the mission_analysis.log file something is happening in the segment 8 in climb...

UNICADOworkflow_2024-12-04_16-46-48_28_Failed_execution_CSMR-2020.zip

The pathes are somehow not correct (needs to be in_flight_energy/trip_energy and loaded_mission_energy/mission_energy), but if those are corrected there are errors because of missing data in the mission.xml file...I'm searching for the reason

If you apply your suggestions, I can test it :) (If I apply I think I can not be a reviewer anymore)

aborted the automatic merge because the source branch was updated. Learn more.

added 1 commit

• 3bf5cfb7 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• 4584e8f4 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version

I'm on it!

Looks like this works! UNICADOworkflow_2024-12-04_17-18-00_69_CSMR-2020.zip

I get mostly the same results (convergence 0.01) old: 42727, new: 72667 - so 60 kg are like nothing

I would now change some TLARs and check if this makes it more. Is that ok?

Nice!!! sure, go for it

Ran design point C with additional_cargo_mass=0 (instead of 2200) and range=5450436 (instead of 4537400) UNICADOworkflow_2024-12-04_17-38-43_54_CSMR-2020.zip Should be same results to the previous design (at least I think) but they differ slightly - I think this is ok:

parameter	run 1	run 2
OEM	72667	72866
MTOM	79295	79815

I will run some more tests tomorrow morning and think about the results

added 1 commit

• 974d57d0 - Apply 1 suggestion(s) to 1 file(s)

Compare with previous version