Choose a name, versioning scheme and liocense for pypi
Somebody registered a package with the name qutil on pypi last year. I think we should register qutil under a different name there so it can be depended upon. Additionally, we should adapt a versioning scheme that shows that this is an unstructured ongoing effort. I suggest using "YYYY.MM" with regular (automatic) releases of the master branch.
Summary:
- New name
qutech-util
with a builtinqutil
alias by default. - Versioning scheme "YYYY.MM" @tobias.hangleiter @stillpaul
EDIT: I just realized that the code is already under GPLv3 license
Edited by Simon Sebastian Humpohl