Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
C
CF4DTs_WS23
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Iterations
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Service Desk
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
This is an archived project. Repository and other project resources are read-only.
Show more breadcrumbs
mbd
CF4DTs_WS23
Commits
83b17fac
Commit
83b17fac
authored
1 year ago
by
Dipankul Bhattacharya
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
workflow Li/Bai added
parent
caa4f633
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
workflow_Tiankai_Li_Haogeng_Bai.ipynb
+109
-0
109 additions, 0 deletions
workflow_Tiankai_Li_Haogeng_Bai.ipynb
with
109 additions
and
0 deletions
workflow_Tiankai_Li_Haogeng_Bai.ipynb
0 → 100644
+
109
−
0
View file @
83b17fac
{
"cells": [
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"<img src=\"https://pad.gwdg.de/uploads/08e0f09e-ed2d-463f-8f92-e7ea3c661d18.png\" width=\"40%\">"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"# Computational Foundations of Digital Twin Technologies"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
"# Bayesian Active Learning of Model Parameters to Increase Predictive Quality in Digital Twins of Flow-like Geohazards Main work packages\n",
"\n",
"## 1. Introduction to Bayesian Active Learning and Geohazard Prediction\n",
"- Overview of Bayesian active learning.\n",
"- Relevance in geohazard prediction and digital twin modeling.\n",
"\n",
"## 2. Deep Dive into the Article\n",
"- Analysis of Bayesian inference, Gaussian process emulation, active learning in the context of the article.\n",
"- Discussion on computational challenges and solutions.\n",
"\n",
"## 3. Practical Application and Tool Familiarization\n",
"- Hands-on session with PSimPy: Run predefined examples.\n",
"- Integration of Bayesian active learning in landslide modeling.\n",
"\n",
"## 4. Data Analysis and Model Calibration\n",
"- Replication of study scenarios from the article.\n",
"- Comparative analysis of posteriors for different observations.\n",
"- Impact of data error and observational types on model accuracy.\n",
"\n",
"## 5. Discussion and Critical Analysis\n",
"- Findings in the context of the article.\n",
"- Evaluation of Bayesian active learning approach effectiveness and limitations.\n",
"\n",
"\n",
"# Presentation on Bayesian Active Learning in Geohazard Prediction\n",
"\n",
"## Introduction\n",
"- Brief overview of Bayesian Active Learning.\n",
"- Its significance in geohazard prediction and modeling.\n",
"\n",
"## Article Insights\n",
"- Key concepts from the article on computational challenges in geohazard prediction.\n",
"- Solutions offered by Bayesian approaches.\n",
"\n",
"## Practical Session with PSimPy\n",
"- Demonstration of PSimPy for landslide modeling.\n",
"- Implementation of Bayesian Active Learning in practical scenarios.\n",
"\n",
"## Data Analysis and Results\n",
"- Analysis of different observational data types.\n",
"- Impact on model accuracy and predictions.\n",
"\n",
"## Critical Discussion\n",
"- Effectiveness and limitations of Bayesian Active Learning.\n",
"- Examples and insights from the article.\n",
"\n",
"## Conclusion\n",
"- Summary of findings.\n",
"- Future applications and potential advancements.\n",
"\n",
"## Q&A Session\n",
"- Open discussion and clarification of concepts.\n",
"\n",
"\n"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": []
}
],
"metadata": {
"interpreter": {
"hash": "bb26e2ef932dc7666f98bbb35229998317c6141f0df4c346da4264046b0e9d5c"
},
"kernelspec": {
"display_name": "Python 3 (ipykernel)",
"language": "python",
"name": "python3"
},
"language_info": {
"codemirror_mode": {
"name": "ipython",
"version": 3
},
"file_extension": ".py",
"mimetype": "text/x-python",
"name": "python",
"nbconvert_exporter": "python",
"pygments_lexer": "ipython3",
"version": "3.9.7"
}
},
"nbformat": 4,
"nbformat_minor": 4
}
%% Cell type:markdown id: tags:
<img
src=
"https://pad.gwdg.de/uploads/08e0f09e-ed2d-463f-8f92-e7ea3c661d18.png"
width=
"40%"
>
%% Cell type:markdown id: tags:
# Computational Foundations of Digital Twin Technologies
%% Cell type:markdown id: tags:
# Bayesian Active Learning of Model Parameters to Increase Predictive Quality in Digital Twins of Flow-like Geohazards Main work packages
## 1. Introduction to Bayesian Active Learning and Geohazard Prediction
-
Overview of Bayesian active learning.
-
Relevance in geohazard prediction and digital twin modeling.
## 2. Deep Dive into the Article
-
Analysis of Bayesian inference, Gaussian process emulation, active learning in the context of the article.
-
Discussion on computational challenges and solutions.
## 3. Practical Application and Tool Familiarization
-
Hands-on session with PSimPy: Run predefined examples.
-
Integration of Bayesian active learning in landslide modeling.
## 4. Data Analysis and Model Calibration
-
Replication of study scenarios from the article.
-
Comparative analysis of posteriors for different observations.
-
Impact of data error and observational types on model accuracy.
## 5. Discussion and Critical Analysis
-
Findings in the context of the article.
-
Evaluation of Bayesian active learning approach effectiveness and limitations.
# Presentation on Bayesian Active Learning in Geohazard Prediction
## Introduction
-
Brief overview of Bayesian Active Learning.
-
Its significance in geohazard prediction and modeling.
## Article Insights
-
Key concepts from the article on computational challenges in geohazard prediction.
-
Solutions offered by Bayesian approaches.
## Practical Session with PSimPy
-
Demonstration of PSimPy for landslide modeling.
-
Implementation of Bayesian Active Learning in practical scenarios.
## Data Analysis and Results
-
Analysis of different observational data types.
-
Impact on model accuracy and predictions.
## Critical Discussion
-
Effectiveness and limitations of Bayesian Active Learning.
-
Examples and insights from the article.
## Conclusion
-
Summary of findings.
-
Future applications and potential advancements.
## Q&A Session
-
Open discussion and clarification of concepts.
%% Cell type:code id: tags:
```
python
```
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment