Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
C
citygml-energy
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 26
    • Issues 26
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
  • Merge Requests 0
    • Merge Requests 0
  • Requirements
    • Requirements
    • List
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test Cases
  • Security & Compliance
    • Security & Compliance
    • Dependency List
    • License Compliance
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Code Review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Members
    • Members
  • Collapse sidebar
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
  • energyade
  • citygml-energy
  • Issues
  • #105

Closed
Open
Opened Apr 13, 2016 by Moritz Robert Lauster@mlausterMaintainer

Clarification of attribute "buildingType"

Created by: JoachimBenner

The ADEElement _AbstractBuilding has an attribute buildingType, defined as

Classification of building according with their usage and form (e.g. single-family house, multi-family house, office building, industrial building).

I thik that a usage classification and a form classification are two different topics which should not be mixed. For the usage classification, there already exist two attributes in the CityGML base standard (function - originally intended building function; usage - actual building usage). Thus, I think the attribute buildingType should only define a form typology. In this context, is the actually existing Codelist BuildingType really adequate?

Assignee
Assign to
backlog
Milestone
backlog
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: energyade/citygml-energy#105