EMADL2CPP issueshttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/issues2019-07-26T13:42:32+02:00https://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/issues/13Move to EMADL2019-07-26T13:42:32+02:00Evgeny KusmenkoMove to EMADLCan this clas be moved to EMADL language project?
https://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/blob/develop/src/main/java/de/monticore/lang/monticar/emadl/generator/EMADLAbstractSymtab.javaCan this clas be moved to EMADL language project?
https://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/blob/develop/src/main/java/de/monticore/lang/monticar/emadl/generator/EMADLAbstractSymtab.javaNicola GattoEyĆ¼p HarputluNicola Gattohttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/issues/12Checksum calculation for larger files fails2019-06-25T15:57:21+02:00Aydin AlatasChecksum calculation for larger files failsThe method `getChecksumForFile(...)` in file EMADLGenerator.java fails for larger files. It was executed on our training set (~2.0 GB) and failed.The method `getChecksumForFile(...)` in file EMADLGenerator.java fails for larger files. It was executed on our training set (~2.0 GB) and failed.Aydin AlatasAydin Alatashttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/issues/11Dependency Issue2019-06-04T19:36:21+02:00Evgeny KusmenkoDependency Issuemvn clean install -s settings.xml can't get monticar commons dependencymvn clean install -s settings.xml can't get monticar commons dependencyhttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/issues/9Internal State may prevent multiple sequential executions2019-02-24T20:50:07+01:00Christopher Jan-Steffen BrixInternal State may prevent multiple sequential executionsThere seems to be some internal state which is stored across multiple executions of the `main` in the `EMADLGeneratorCli`.
This causes the following effect: Usually, the unit test `testMultipleInstances` passes without problems. However, adding a [certain new test](https://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/blob/oneclick_nn_training/src/test/java/de/monticore/lang/monticar/emadl/GenerationTest.java#L205) (which passes) causes it to fail. It now throws a NullPointerException.There seems to be some internal state which is stored across multiple executions of the `main` in the `EMADLGeneratorCli`.
This causes the following effect: Usually, the unit test `testMultipleInstances` passes without problems. However, adding a [certain new test](https://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/blob/oneclick_nn_training/src/test/java/de/monticore/lang/monticar/emadl/GenerationTest.java#L205) (which passes) causes it to fail. It now throws a NullPointerException.Evgeny KusmenkoEvgeny Kusmenkohttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/monticore/EmbeddedMontiArc/generators/EMADL2CPP/issues/8Lab: Image based Calculator2019-01-30T13:12:28+01:00Evgeny KusmenkoLab: Image based CalculatorTo evaluate #7 the goal is to design a small EMADL model featuring several DL components as well as some math components. The input of this model are 3 MNIST pictures and 2 CIFAR10 pictures.
Each input picture is translated to its respective class number. These numbers are then fed forward to a math component which would compute a polynomial of the form y=a1*x1+a_21*x2^2 + a3, where the a's are coefficients given by the MNIST images and the x's are the variables provide by the cifar10 classes.
Please evaluate the individual test error for each component as well as the whole systems test error. Which loss function is suitable for this problem?To evaluate #7 the goal is to design a small EMADL model featuring several DL components as well as some math components. The input of this model are 3 MNIST pictures and 2 CIFAR10 pictures.
Each input picture is translated to its respective class number. These numbers are then fed forward to a math component which would compute a polynomial of the form y=a1*x1+a_21*x2^2 + a3, where the a's are coefficients given by the MNIST images and the x's are the variables provide by the cifar10 classes.
Please evaluate the individual test error for each component as well as the whole systems test error. Which loss function is suitable for this problem?2019-01-23Christopher Jan-Steffen BrixChristopher Jan-Steffen Brix