Meeting-notes.md

@@ -2,6 +2,21 @@
 
 [Overleaf Project](https://www.overleaf.com/project/609e78ba5a26a76cd6a2a580)
 
+# Meeting 2021-08-05
+
+- Run a single case with and without dynamicAlphaContactAngle BC (standard one in OpenFOAM-v2012) and compare the results (spreading area / time). 
+
+- Check [`reconstructionSchemes`](https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/guides/latest/api/classFoam_1_1reconstructionSchemes.html) (specifically [`plicRDF`](https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/guides/latest/api/classFoam_1_1reconstruction_1_1plicRDF.html)  - not sure about class names, start with `isoAdvection`) class to see if it does anything special for the boundary patch where we use dynamicAlphaContactAngle - 
+
+```
+     //- Interface area normals
+        volVectorField normal_;
+```
+
+in `reconstructionSchemes.C` : cell-centered normals are used, that are specific to the scheme! What does `dynamicAlphaContactAngle` do with the interface normals? Does it fetch the normal field by name using a dictionary, or modify BC for alpha using fixedGradient?
+
+![Whiteboard_1_-01](uploads/42818d7598166320110ee82b4500ff0e/Whiteboard_1_-01.png)
+
 # Meeting 2021-08-02 
 
 _Validation of interIsoFoam for wetting as an overarching goal for the first paper_