citygml-energy issueshttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/energyade/citygml-energy/-/issues2019-09-09T16:14:51+02:00https://git.rwth-aachen.de/energyade/citygml-energy/-/issues/168How to model multiple Buildings supplied by one EnergyConversionSystem2019-09-09T16:14:51+02:00Peter RemmenHow to model multiple Buildings supplied by one EnergyConversionSystemI want to model multiple buildings that are supplied by one `EnergyConversionSystem`. I only want to model the conversion system and attach a timeseries to the system. I do **not** want to model the `EnergyConversionSystem` . `EnergyFlow...I want to model multiple buildings that are supplied by one `EnergyConversionSystem`. I only want to model the conversion system and attach a timeseries to the system. I do **not** want to model the `EnergyConversionSystem` . `EnergyFlow` or the `EmitterSystem` in detail.
In previous version (I think) there was something like `EnergyConversionSystem.provides` where it was possible to link multiple `CityObject`. I do not see this link anymore.
I tried using `EnergyDemand`, but the link to `CityObject` with `demands` (in German: "verlangt") and `demandedBy` (in German: "wird verlangt von") is **very** confusing. Any ideas how to model that?
Suggestion: A direct link between `EnergyConversionSystem` and `EnergyDemand` (`EnergyDemand -> isProvidedBy -> AbstractEnergyConversionSystem`) would helpful.https://git.rwth-aachen.de/energyade/citygml-energy/-/issues/166Link SystemOperation to AbstractEnergySystem?2019-09-09T15:34:14+02:00Giorgio AgugiaroLink SystemOperation to AbstractEnergySystem?This is a question for the experts.
So far we have the SystemOperation class tied to AbstractConversionSystem.
It is (my guess) rather for historical reasons, as it was so before we changed the overall structure of the EnergySystem modul...This is a question for the experts.
So far we have the SystemOperation class tied to AbstractConversionSystem.
It is (my guess) rather for historical reasons, as it was so before we changed the overall structure of the EnergySystem module in v. 0.9.
Now, would it not make more sense to move the SystemOperation class one step higher (hence linked to AbstractEnergySystem? I can imagine that also the other systems might have some operation schedules, not only the conversion ones.
@malhotra, what do you think?https://git.rwth-aachen.de/energyade/citygml-energy/-/issues/165Rename AbstractStorageSystem2019-09-09T15:31:43+02:00Giorgio AgugiaroRename AbstractStorageSystemFor naming coherency, I'd propose to rename class AbstractStorageSystem to AbstractEnergyStorageSystem. This would be in line with what we do with distribution and conversion systems.For naming coherency, I'd propose to rename class AbstractStorageSystem to AbstractEnergyStorageSystem. This would be in line with what we do with distribution and conversion systems.