distaix merge requestshttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/acs/public/simulation/DistAIXFramework/distaix/-/merge_requests2022-01-24T09:59:29+01:00https://git.rwth-aachen.de/acs/public/simulation/DistAIXFramework/distaix/-/merge_requests/13Draft: Resolve "Check topology of scenario at startup"2022-01-24T09:59:29+01:00Sonja HappDraft: Resolve "Check topology of scenario at startup"Related to #13Related to #13Sonja HappSonja Happhttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/acs/public/simulation/DistAIXFramework/distaix/-/merge_requests/6WIP: added possibility to explicitly define non-intelligent prosumers2021-07-20T15:59:29+02:00Sonja HappWIP: added possibility to explicitly define non-intelligent prosumersPlease see #3
Not clear if this code is really needed. If it is, we should find a solution that does not hard-code any prosumer IDs.
CC @felix.wegePlease see #3
Not clear if this code is really needed. If it is, we should find a solution that does not hard-code any prosumer IDs.
CC @felix.wegeSonja HappSonja Happhttps://git.rwth-aachen.de/acs/public/simulation/DistAIXFramework/distaix/-/merge_requests/5WIP: Merge dist2dist branch?2021-07-20T15:52:30+02:00Sonja HappWIP: Merge dist2dist branch?@felix.wege
Can we please agree whether or not there is content in the dist2dist branch that is worth merging? The branch is WAY behind the master and I would like to clean up a little. Do you have any comments?@felix.wege
Can we please agree whether or not there is content in the dist2dist branch that is worth merging? The branch is WAY behind the master and I would like to clean up a little. Do you have any comments?Sonja HappSonja Happ